RESEARCH 》 Power consumption of my Home Lab devices for research

AMD RYZEN 3 1200 - FreeNAS Storage array build

CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 1200 (4 cores/4 threads)

RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR4 LPX 2400MHz C16 Kit

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2 AM44

Graphics/Display: Asus Geforce 210GT 1GB DDR3

PSU: Circle CPH698V12-400

Storage: WDC WD10JPVX-75JC3T0 - WD 1TB HDD

System BIOS 53 watts

Idle System (Linux Ubuntu OS) 52 watts

Casual browsing 53 watts

Youtube video playback 60 watts

Kernel compilation with 4-threads "make -j4" (99% load) 74 watts

Kernel compilation with 3-threads "make -j3" (80% load) 71 watts

My Intel Core i7-5820K - Desktop build

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K (6 cores/12 threads)

RAM: Corsair PC2800 DDR4 14GB Kit

Motherboard: Gigabyte X99-UD4

Graphics/Display: Asus Geforce 210GT 1GB DDR3

PSU: Corsair VS450

CPU Liquid Cooling system: Cooler Master Nepton 240m

Storage: Transcend TS128GSSD370 128GB SSD

Idle System (Linux Ubuntu OS) 70 watts

System BIOS 90 watts

Linux kernel compilation (80%) load 150 watts

My Intel Celeron CPU 1037U Mini PC WAN Optimization Device

CPU: Intel Celeron CPU 1037U

RAM: DDR3 PC3L 4GB

Storage: Transcend TS128GSSD370 128GB SSD

Idle System (Linux Ubuntu OS) 18-20 watts

System BIOS 16.5 watts

Linux kernel compilation (95%) load 21-24 watts

My HP Envy 15-J111TX Laptop

CPU: Intel Corei7-4700MQ

RAM: DDR3 PC3L 12GB

Storage: WD Blue 250GB Scorpio HDD

Idle System (Linux Ubuntu OS) charging 44 watts

Idle System (Linux Ubuntu OS) charged 15 watts

Poweroff charging 28 watts

Poweroff charged 0.1 watts

Poweron charged suspend 0.75 watts

Linux kernel compilation (95%) load charging 90 watts

Linux kernel compilation (95%) load charged 69 watts

My Dell 15R 5537 Laptop

CPU: Intel Corei7-4500U

RAM: DDR3 PC3L 8GB

Storage: Seagate 320GB Momentus HDD

Idle System (Linux Ubuntu OS) charging 42 watts

Idle System (Linux Ubuntu OS) charged 10 watts

Poweroff charging 29 watts

Poweroff charged 0.1 watts

Poweron charged suspend 0.70 watts

Linux kernel compilation (95%) load charging 60 watts

Linux kernel compilation (95%) load charged 30 watts

My Acer Aspire 4810T Laptop

CPU: Intel Core Solo SU3500 1.4 GHz

RAM: DDR3 PC3 4GB

Storage: WD Blue 250GB Scorpio HDD

* No Battery, so no charging.

Idle System (Linux Manjaro OS) 16.23 watts

System BIOS 24.30 watts

Casual Browsing 22.27 watts

Youtube Playback 22.45 watts

Raspberry Pi2 Device

Powered via 2Amp USB power-supply

Raspbian OS

USB mouse and USB keyboard connected

Casual browsing 2.6 - 3 watts

Youtube video playback (25% load) 3 - 3.5 watts

Kernel compilation with 4-threads "make -j4" (99% load) 3.9 - 4 watts

Kernel compilation with 3-threads "make -j3" 3.67 - 3.75 watts

idle device with no keyboard and no mouse 2.08 - 2.1 watts

NETGEAR RN104 ReadyNAS

2x 2.5'' Laptop HDD drives

2x 3.5'' Desktop HDD drives

Single x-RAID volume with 4 HDD drives

Device off but plugged-in 0.58 watts

Idle device after booting 28 watts

File copy (write operation) 28.7 watts

RAID Volume scrub operation 29.5 watts

APC BX600C-IN UPS - APC Back-UPS 600 (UPS not powered-on but connected to live power socket)

Standby Charging 13.5 watts

Standby not-Charging 7.8 watts

APC BX600CI-IN UPS - APC Back-UPS 600 (UPS not powered-on but connected to live power socket)

Standby Charging 9.5 watts

Standby not-Charging 10-0.9 watts

BenQ LED Monitor 24'' GW2470HM

off plugged-in 0.00 watts

Dim 11.7 watts

LG LCD TV Monitor 23'' M237WA-PT

off plugged-in 0.8 watts

Dim 33 watts

Bright 45 watts

Samsung LCD Monitor 22'' 2243NWX

off plugged-in 0.7 watts

Dim 20 watts

Bright 33.5 watts

Power consumption of my Home Lab devices for research

Here is my power-consumption measurements of various devices deployed within my home lab. I measured via my kill-a-watt sort of power-meter which is fairly reliable and accurate. I checked its accuracy with various standard load such as Philips LED laps and other constant power-consuming devices to make sure that the power-meter is precise.

So far I maintained this data in my personal Google drive spreadsheet documents. But now I thought perhaps its good to share these numbers so that it is useful for various users to access their equipment such as:

decide UPS and battery backup ratings
off-grid solar power installations
choose new upgraded hardware which consumes less power and deliver better performance such as SSD over traditional HDD, new CPU, new Monitor, new laptop, servers, desktops and so on. And discard obsolete old hardware.
choosing the right PSU (power supply unit) for your desktop PC build

Before posting this article I shot a VLOG regarding the same and posted in my Youtube channel The Linux Channel. You can kindly watch the same:

Explore my lab's historical month wise power-usage trends: I started logging my entire lab monthly power-consumption readings. You can read the article HERE.

Off-Grid Solar Power System for Raspberry Pi: When you choose to use your Raspberry Pi device as your IoT based remote weather station or if you are building Linux kernel (like kernel compilation) within the same, you need a good uninterrupted power source (UPS). But if you are using it on site or in some research camping location you can choose to power your Raspberry Pi device with your custom off-grid solar power source. Kindly read my complete article about the same HERE.

Suggested Topics:

Generic Home Lab Research

💎 TOFFEE-MOCHA new bootable ISO: Download

💎 TOFFEE Data-Center Big picture and Overview: Download PDF

推荐主题：

Introducing TOFFEE-Butterscotch - Save and Optimize your Internet/WAN bandwidth ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

TOFFEE-Butterscotch yet another variant of TOFFEE can be used to save and optimize your Home/SOHO Internet/WAN bandwidth. Unlike TOFFEE (and TOFFEE-DataCenter) TOFFEE-Butterscotch is a non peer-to-peer (and asymmetric) network optimization solution. This makes TOFFEE-Butterscotch an ideal tool for all Home and SOHO users.

YouTube Video Network Traffic Optimization - WAN Optimization Demo ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Introducing TOFFEE-DataCenter ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

TOFFEE TOFFEE Data-Center is specifically meant for Data Center, Cluster Computing, HPC applications. TOFFEE is built in Linux Kernel core. This makes it inflexible to adapt according to the hardware configuration. It does sequential packet processing and does not scale up well in large multi-core CPU based systems (such as Intel Xeon servers, Core i7 Extreme Desktop systems,etc). Apart from this since it is kernel based, if there is an issue in kernel, it may crash entire system. This becomes a challenge for any carrier grade equipment (CGE) hardware build.

TOFFEE-Mocha Documentation :: TOFFEE-Mocha-1.0.32-1-x86_64 and TOFFEE-Mocha-1.0.32-1-i386 ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Building my own CDN - choosing a web-hosting to deploy my CDN - Update: 28-July-2016 ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

The TOFFEE Project website is hosted on Inmotion Hosting. And so I am looking for alternate hosting provider to build my first CDN node. My plan is to make multiple sub-domains of my website such as cdn1.the-toffee-project.org, cdn2.the-toffee-project.org and point each of this corresponding subdomain(s) to various alternative web hosting servers geographically spread across the world. Sometimes choosing the same vendor for multiple CDN nodes may result multiple servers existing in the data-center. And this becomes an issue if there is some catastrophic network disaster.

TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization software development - Update: 13-Aug-2016 ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Earlier the TOFFEE is intended to work on IoT devices, Satellite Networks, branch office/SOHO deployments. In most cases the users may deploy just one or couple of TOFFEE devices per site. But in the case of TOFFEE-DataCenter, users can scale-up deploying the same in multiple servers in a sort of distributed cluster computing scenario. Besides the core TOFFEE-DataCenter components (such as packet processing engine/framework), I need to do lot of changes in its Graphical User Interface (GUI) too to address these new requirements.

TOFFEE-Mocha WAN Emulation software development - Update: 19-July-2016 ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Today I refined the first page consolidated report graphs. TOFFEE-Mocha (unlike TOFFEE) is a WAN Emulator, so the graphs are supposed to highlight this purpose and should display the overall network activity. Unlike TOFFEE, the TOFFEE-Mocha report should contain in general what is received versus what is sent across the wire. In case if the packet drop feature is enabled, you should see few missing bytes and packets. Similarly in future I may support packet duplication feature, in that case you may see more packets/bytes sent versus the packets/bytes actually received.

Live demo - Data Transfer - High bandwidth to Low bandwidth ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

I always wanted to do some real experiments and research on packet flow patterns from High-bandwidth to Low-bandwidth networks via networking devices. This is something can be analyzed via capturing Network stack buffer data and other parameters, bench-marking, and so on. But eventually the data-transfer nature and other aspects is often contaminated due to the underlying OS and the way Network stack is implemented. So to understand the nature of packet flow from Higher to Lower bandwidth and vice-versa such as Lower to higher bandwidth, I thought I experiment with various tools and things which physically we can observe this phenomena.

CDN Content Delivery Networks - Types ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Demo TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization packaging feature ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Featured Educational Video:

在YouTube上观看 - [4073//1] 0x1c9 NAS OS | Expert's take on FreeNAS vs UNRAID | My two cents | Best Tips ↗

My sample Wireshark packet capture files for research ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

I have a huge repository (or collection) of sample Wireshark packet capture files for reference. I use them extensively for research and development of TOFFEE as well to understand various protocol PDUs and protocol standards. I personally collected various test captures via Wireshark during my test and experimental research setup during the course of TOFFEE development. Say if you are a student and learning Networking and or say VoIP data and VoIP packets, you can analyse my VoIP sample Wireshark captures. Or in other case assume you are doing some quick research (or development) and want to refer few handful of VoIP packets then you can download and analyse my sample packet capture files.

Why TOFFEE is forked from TrafficSqueezer ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

TrafficSqueezer is an open-source WAN Optimization project. TrafficSqueezer is mainly a research project which is started around mid-2006. It is initially started as a research (or prototype) code even before it is officially registered in Sourceforge.net. But this code is just primitive user-space raw socket modules. This is later refined and a pre-alpha version is created. Followed by which Alpha release. This prototype code is moved from user-space to Linux Kernel (Kernel Space) and then the journey begin in terms of making a serious WAN Optimization solution. Once the pre-beta and beta releases are complete the mainstream series is started.

Tweaking Network Latency - Live Demo - via TOFFEE-DataCenter ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

TOFFEE Data-Center optimized Internet of Things (IoT) Platform ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

在YouTube上观看 - [889//1] 280 WAN Optimization - Animated demo of Packet Optimization in TOFFEE-DataCenter ↗

Timelapse Screen Capture of TOFFEE-DataCenter Network Acceleration - with new RRDtool graph support ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Timelapse Screen Capture of TOFFEE-DataCenter Network Acceleration - with new RRDtool graph support

Research :: Optimization of network data (WAN Optimization) at various levels:
Network File level network data WAN Optimization

Learn Linux Systems Software and Kernel Programming:
Linux, Kernel, Networking and Systems-Software online classes

Hardware Compression and Decompression Accelerator Cards:
TOFFEE Architecture with Compression and Decompression Accelerator Card [CDN]

TOFFEE-DataCenter on a Dell Server - Intel Xeon E5645 CPU:
TOFFEE-DataCenter screenshots on a Dual CPU - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz - Dell Server

💎 TOFFEE-MOCHA new bootable ISO:	Download

💎 TOFFEE Data-Center Big picture and Overview:	Download PDF