TOFFEEプロジェクト
ホームドキュメンテーション更新ビデオ研究ダウンロードスポンサー接触


DOCUMENTATION 》 TEST CASES :: TEST RESULTS :: TOFFEE-Mocha-1.0.14 Development version

Here are the TOFFEE-Mocha test cases and test results of the upcoming new TOFFEE-Mocha which is still under development. The features of this TOFFEE-Mocha are discussed in the software development update: TOFFEE-Mocha WAN Emulation software development - Update: 1-July-2016

Test case1 :: 999 millisecond constant packet delay: As you can see unlike 40 milliseconds the maximum limit which existed earlier, the new 999 milliseconds delay range allows users to slow down the transfer rates even further.

[email protected]:~/temp$ ping 192.168.0.1 -s 1000
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2998 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2997 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=3995 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=3985 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=3984 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=3984 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=3983 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=3982 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=3984 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=3982 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
18 packets transmitted, 14 received, 22% packet loss, time 17007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2000.042/3277.214/3995.537/873.965 ms, pipe 4
[email protected]:~/temp$

Test case2 :: 500 millisecond constant packet delay: With 500 milliseconds you get roughly double the performance of 999 milliseconds.

[email protected]:~/temp$ ping 192.168.0.1 -s 1000
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1488 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1481 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1481 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1008 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 10 received, 9% packet loss, time 10017ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1002.077/1147.151/1488.063/220.133 ms, pipe 2
[email protected]:~/temp$

Test case3 :: 500 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay (in this case 500 milliseconds) if you enable the new random packet delay feature, it will skip delay randomly few packets. Which can be controlled via random delay factor. In this case the random delay factor value is set to 1. And you can see below few packets are not delayed. Hence their ping response time almost reduced to half (i.e around 500 ms).

[email protected]:~/temp$ ping 192.168.0.1 -s 1000
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1503 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1497 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=419 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=502 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=502 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 21 received, 4% packet loss, time 21029ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 419.093/974.135/1503.026/250.662 ms, pipe 2
[email protected]:~/temp$

Random Packet delay: As discussed in my VLOG/update earlier, the idea of Random packet delay is to introduce the fluctuating, bursty nature of packet flow. So here are various tests done which shows the same in action. These tests below are performed while downloading a large file by enabling random packet delay along with various values of constant packet delay.

Test case4 :: 2 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay of 2 millisecond and random packet delay you can notice the blue curve which almost appears constant. The traffic in this case is bursty but it is not that significant to notice in the graph shown below.
TOFFEE_Mocha_2ms_delay_with_random_packet_delay

Test case5 :: 10 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay of 10 millisecond and random packet delay you can notice the blue curve which almost appears constant. The traffic in this case is bursty but it is not that significant to notice in the graph shown below. But it appears somewhat fluctuating than the 5 millisecond test case4 above.
TOFFEE_Mocha_10ms_delay_with_random_packet_delay

Test case6 :: 200 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay of 200 millisecond and random packet delay you can notice the fluctuating blue curve. With this we can understand the true purpose of random packet delay.
TOFFEE_Mocha_200ms_delay_with_random_packet_delay

Test case7 :: 200 millisecond constant packet delay + WITHOUT random packet delay: With constant delay of 200 millisecond and WITHOUT random packet delay feature enabled you can notice the steady blue curve. This is a direct comparison of a test case with constant packet delay 200 millisecond with and without random packet delay. With random packet delay it makes the network performance choppy, fluctuating and bursty, but without random packet delay feature the network performance appears almost constant.
TOFFEE_Mocha_200ms_delay_without_random_packet_delay

So in my next upcoming TOFFEE-Mocha release I may include all these new features and updated old features. If you are in need of any specific feature (or scenario) you can kindly let know. If plausible and feasible I can support the same and release as a part of my upcoming TOFFEE-Mocha release. Kindly stay tuned !



Suggested Topics:


TOFFEE-Mocha - WAN Emulator


Categories

💎 TOFFEE-MOCHA new bootable ISO: Download
💎 TOFFEE Data-Center Big picture and Overview: Download PDF


おすすめトピック:

CDN Hosting ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
It is quite interesting that there are few web hosting firms are offering direct CDN based hosting services. Since it is a direct CDN based hosting, it is cheap, extremely easy or transparent CDN service. It is transparent, since each time you publish your content in the hosting web-server (origin server), it is immediately is in sync automatically in the user-serving CDN caching machines. Since the hosting vendor and the CDN vendor are all the same, it is also easy to use their services. There is no incompatibility issues, interoperability issues, and better integrated analytics, are all the benefits of CDN Hosting services.

Recording Lab Monthly off-grid power-consumption readings for research ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020

Introducing TOFFEE-Fudge - Network Packet Generator ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
TOFFEE Fudge is a simple intuitive Network Packet Generator which can be used to create custom test synthetic Network Packets and can be used in various applications such as networking research, network infrastructure troubleshooting, ethical hacking, as a network software development tool and so on.

Building my own CDN - choosing a web-hosting to deploy my CDN - Update: 28-July-2016 ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
The TOFFEE Project website is hosted on Inmotion Hosting. And so I am looking for alternate hosting provider to build my first CDN node. My plan is to make multiple sub-domains of my website such as cdn1.the-toffee-project.org, cdn2.the-toffee-project.org and point each of this corresponding subdomain(s) to various alternative web hosting servers geographically spread across the world. Sometimes choosing the same vendor for multiple CDN nodes may result multiple servers existing in the data-center. And this becomes an issue if there is some catastrophic network disaster.

Moon Base and Space Colonization - First we need fast InterPlanetary Internet ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020

My Lab Battery Purchase and Service logs for Research ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
Here is a complete log of my lab battery purchase, service record which I maintain in Google drive. These I use for my home (or my family generic use) as well as a part of my home lab. I maintain a detailed log this way to monitor the failure rate of these batteries. This will allow me to select a specific brand/model which has higher success rate and to monitor any premature failure/expiry. The service log helps me to monitor and schedule the next service routine so that I can maintain these batteries in tip-top condition.

Youtubeで見る - [218//0] Inflight WiFi - Technology, Challenges, Evolution ↗


CDN Hosting ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
It is quite interesting that there are few web hosting firms are offering direct CDN based hosting services. Since it is a direct CDN based hosting, it is cheap, extremely easy or transparent CDN service. It is transparent, since each time you publish your content in the hosting web-server (origin server), it is immediately is in sync automatically in the user-serving CDN caching machines. Since the hosting vendor and the CDN vendor are all the same, it is also easy to use their services. There is no incompatibility issues, interoperability issues, and better integrated analytics, are all the benefits of CDN Hosting services.

Recording Lab Monthly off-grid power-consumption readings for research ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020

Introducing TOFFEE-Fudge - Network Packet Generator ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
TOFFEE Fudge is a simple intuitive Network Packet Generator which can be used to create custom test synthetic Network Packets and can be used in various applications such as networking research, network infrastructure troubleshooting, ethical hacking, as a network software development tool and so on.

Building my own CDN - choosing a web-hosting to deploy my CDN - Update: 28-July-2016 ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
The TOFFEE Project website is hosted on Inmotion Hosting. And so I am looking for alternate hosting provider to build my first CDN node. My plan is to make multiple sub-domains of my website such as cdn1.the-toffee-project.org, cdn2.the-toffee-project.org and point each of this corresponding subdomain(s) to various alternative web hosting servers geographically spread across the world. Sometimes choosing the same vendor for multiple CDN nodes may result multiple servers existing in the data-center. And this becomes an issue if there is some catastrophic network disaster.



Featured Educational Video:
Youtubeで見る - [44//0] 0xd Failed FreeNAS ZFS RAID-Z2 Debug | VLOG | #TheFreeBSDChannel #FreeBSD #NAS ↗

CDN Hosting ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
It is quite interesting that there are few web hosting firms are offering direct CDN based hosting services. Since it is a direct CDN based hosting, it is cheap, extremely easy or transparent CDN service. It is transparent, since each time you publish your content in the hosting web-server (origin server), it is immediately is in sync automatically in the user-serving CDN caching machines. Since the hosting vendor and the CDN vendor are all the same, it is also easy to use their services. There is no incompatibility issues, interoperability issues, and better integrated analytics, are all the benefits of CDN Hosting services.

Recording Lab Monthly off-grid power-consumption readings for research ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020

Introducing TOFFEE-Fudge - Network Packet Generator ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
TOFFEE Fudge is a simple intuitive Network Packet Generator which can be used to create custom test synthetic Network Packets and can be used in various applications such as networking research, network infrastructure troubleshooting, ethical hacking, as a network software development tool and so on.

Building my own CDN - choosing a web-hosting to deploy my CDN - Update: 28-July-2016 ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
The TOFFEE Project website is hosted on Inmotion Hosting. And so I am looking for alternate hosting provider to build my first CDN node. My plan is to make multiple sub-domains of my website such as cdn1.the-toffee-project.org, cdn2.the-toffee-project.org and point each of this corresponding subdomain(s) to various alternative web hosting servers geographically spread across the world. Sometimes choosing the same vendor for multiple CDN nodes may result multiple servers existing in the data-center. And this becomes an issue if there is some catastrophic network disaster.



Youtubeで見る - [206//0] 165 Q&A - VPN Services, Network Data Compression and VPN Service Providers ↗

CDN Hosting ↗
Tuesday' 04-Aug-2020
It is quite interesting that there are few web hosting firms are offering direct CDN based hosting services. Since it is a direct CDN based hosting, it is cheap, extremely easy or transparent CDN service. It is transparent, since each time you publish your content in the hosting web-server (origin server), it is immediately is in sync automatically in the user-serving CDN caching machines. Since the hosting vendor and the CDN vendor are all the same, it is also easy to use their services. There is no incompatibility issues, interoperability issues, and better integrated analytics, are all the benefits of CDN Hosting services.



Research :: Optimization of network data (WAN Optimization) at various levels:
Network File level network data WAN Optimization


Learn Linux Systems Software and Kernel Programming:
Linux, Kernel, Networking and Systems-Software online classes


Hardware Compression and Decompression Accelerator Cards:
TOFFEE Architecture with Compression and Decompression Accelerator Card


TOFFEE-DataCenter on a Dell Server - Intel Xeon E5645 CPU:
TOFFEE-DataCenter screenshots on a Dual CPU - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz - Dell Server