Проект TOFFEE
ГЛАВНАЯДОКУМЕНТАЦИЯОБНОВЛЕНИЕВИДЕОИССЛЕДОВАНИЕСКАЧАТЬСПОНСОРЫконтакт


RESEARCH 》 A study on Deep Space Networks (DSN)

When you are dealing Deep Space Networks (DSN) one among the most challenging parts is the Interplanetary distances and communicating data across such vast distances. This is where we are not dealing with common Internet type traffic such as HTTP/FTP/VoIP/etc but it is completely different when it comes to DSN so far. So optimizing data in DSN becomes mandatory. For example if you think one of the Mars Rovers, they have used LZO lossless compression. Although they do to an extent lossy compression on images shot by these space-probes at times they we may also need high-resolution detailed high-quality images. And sometimes it is not just photos sent back to the earth, at times the space probes may also report their health status, keep alive messages as well transmit the scientific research data such as data recorded in various sensors situated on-board.

Although we got space probes across the space and ISS (International Space Station) orbiting over Earth, we do not have a scenario yet something like human colonies/bases on Moon or Mars and other planets. Eventually when such things happen in around 2020-2030 or so as the way NASA and scientists predict, DSN is going to be a case where more private companies may offer their solutions. But before that we need to still solve some of the fundamental data communication challenges involved in DSN. This is on of the fields which I am actively involved since a decade.

Unlike here on Earth upgrading a piece of hardware or communication technology is just impossible to do on a space probe which may exist millions of miles away from Earth. This also makes this technology evolve quite slowly unlike Earth bound communication technologies such as Mobile communications, Satellite networks and so on. For further complete coverage of this topic kindly refer my below detailed video titled Deep Space Communication - Episode1.

Understanding Communication Speeds: Most DSN networks are radio-wave signal based and not light (photonic) based communication. Radio waves do not travel at the speed of light. It is also one of the reason for the slow-down of the DSN unlike ground or earth bound fibre optic links since in this case data travels almost (since the medium is not vacuum and speed of light depends on the medium) at the speed of light. Before we imagine network speeds in DSN, let us understand an ideal situation of speed of light between two points in space:

Distance Speed of Light
Earth <> Moon1.5 seconds
Earth <> Mars4 minutes (240 seconds)
Earth <> Sun8 minutes (480 seconds)
Earth <> Jupiter30 minutes (1800 seconds)
Earth <> Saturn1 hour (3600 seconds)
Earth <> Neptune4 hours (14400 seconds)
Earth <> Pluto4.6 hours (16560 seconds)

NOTE: Since we compute network speeds often in bits/sec (and latency in nano-seconds and milli-seconds), in the above chart I am converting everything in seconds to understand the scale.

So based on the above chart now we can understand the scale of complexity in DSN. This underscores a fundamental limitation of physics !

Communication Protocols for DSN: For DSN a complete new set of protocols are defined which is SCP (stands for Space Communications Protocol). There are various RFCs which are defined which is called as SCPS (where S stands for Specifications). There are various variants under SCPS are defined such as SCPS-FP, SCPS-TP, SCPS-SP and SCPS-NP. The biggest difference you may find in DSN is that the delay involved due to inter-planetary distances. So based on the distance you may experience communication delays, loss of packets, etc. Say for example if you think a successful connection is established (for example a TCP session/connection), you may have to-and-fro keep alive acknowledgement packets exchanged every few milliseconds. But whereas in a case of DSN you may experience this happening every few minutes or every few hours. So that is how bizarre it is. Although there is no packet exchanges happening in few minutes or hours you should understand this is due to vast distances involved.

These SCPS specifications are defined by a committee called as CCSDS (stands for Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). This is a body which is formed as per collaborative effort of various space agencies across the world. An Internet spanning across multiple planets is termed as IPN (stands for Interplanetary Network or in short InterPlanet). For further complete coverage of this topic kindly refer my below detailed video titled Deep Space Communication - Episode2.

Lossless Compression Algorithms for DSN: A specific set of tailor made algorithms are required for space communications unlike the ones which are used in communications here on Earth. They have to be light-weight and at the same time super-efficient and should have least processing latencies. The communication data could be just anything such as scientific research data collected via space probe sensors or it could be hi-resolution photos sent back to earth or it could be commands sent to these probes via ground control crew. I have done extensive research on this for almost more than a decade on various lossless compression algorithms. This is a case where we are dealing optimizing real-time data. This is not a passive file compression something like creating a tar-ball or some zipfile. This is a case you are sending and receiving packets continuously and you are processing them in real-time.

NASA have their own lossless compression variants and often they are customized. One of the well known algorithms which NASA uses is the LOCO-I (stands for Low Complexity Lossless Compression) which is mainly meant for compressing images. LOCO-I is a kind of lossless compression variant of JPEG. Which is why it is also can be sometimes called as JPEG-LS (stands for JPEG-Lossless). Based on LOCO-I NASA did hardware based solution which is FPGA-LOCO. Since it is hardware based, it is good in performance, reliability and extremely energy efficient.

Apart from this CCSDS have their own variant of RICE lossless compression algorithm. For further complete coverage of this topic kindly refer my below detailed video titled Space Lossless Compression.

References:

NASA:

Wikipedia:

Other:



Suggested Topics:


WAN Optimization and Network Optimization

💎 TOFFEE-MOCHA new bootable ISO: Download
💎 TOFFEE Data-Center Big picture and Overview: Download PDF


Рекомендуемые темы:

Introducing TOFFEE-Fudge - Network Packet Generator ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
TOFFEE Fudge is a simple intuitive Network Packet Generator which can be used to create custom test synthetic Network Packets and can be used in various applications such as networking research, network infrastructure troubleshooting, ethical hacking, as a network software development tool and so on.

Introducing TOFFEE-Butterscotch - Save and Optimize your Internet/WAN bandwidth ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
TOFFEE-Butterscotch yet another variant of TOFFEE can be used to save and optimize your Home/SOHO Internet/WAN bandwidth. Unlike TOFFEE (and TOFFEE-DataCenter) TOFFEE-Butterscotch is a non peer-to-peer (and asymmetric) network optimization solution. This makes TOFFEE-Butterscotch an ideal tool for all Home and SOHO users.

TOFFEE-DataCenter screenshots on a Dual CPU - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz - Dell Server ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Communication data network standards and data transfer speeds :: Chart ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Here is a complete chart comprising popular communication data network standards and their respective transfer rates. I hope this reference chart will help network engineers and network software developers while performing networking tests and experiments, building WAN/network products, building WAN simulated networks of a specific standard and so on. This may also helps us to track technological advancements of communication data networks.

TOFFEE-Mocha WAN Emulation software development - Update: 15-July-2016 ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Today I completed doing all the changes which are meant for the new upcoming TOFFEE-Mocha release. I have increased the resolution and the range of all factor variables. Instead 1 to 10 range now they have a range of 1 to 30. Unlike before the value 1 means it is lot more intense (or in some cases less intense) and the uppermost value 30 means lot less intense (or in some cases lot intense).

TOFFEE Download :: TOFFEE-1.1.70-1-portable ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021



TOFFEE-Mocha Documentation :: TOFFEE-Mocha - Jitter feature ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

TOFFEE (and TOFFEE-DataCenter) deployment in SD-WAN Applications ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Software-Defined Wide Area Networking (SD-WAN) is a new innovative way to provide optimal application performance by redefining branch office networking. Unlike traditional expensive private WAN connection technologies such as MPLS, etc., SD-WAN delivers increased network performance and cost reduction. SD-WAN solution decouple network software services from the underlying hardware via software abstraction.

The TOFFEE Project :: TOFFEE-DataCenter :: WAN Optimization ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
The TOFFEE Project :: TOFFEE-DataCenter :: Linux Open-Source WAN Optimization

Upgrading Ubuntu 17.10 to 18.04 via TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization Screenshots ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021



Featured Educational Video:
Watch on Youtube - [1836//1] x257 tp-link UE300 Linux Kernel Realtek Driver Codewalk rtl8153a-3 r8152 USB 3.0 to Gigabit - Part1 ↗

Internet optimization through TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization Demo ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Internet optimization through TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization Demo

TOFFEE-Mocha Documentation :: TOFFEE-Mocha-1.0.32-1-x86_64 and TOFFEE-Mocha-1.0.32-1-i386 ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

TOFFEE-DataCenter packet packaging feature for WAN Optimization ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

TOFFEE-DataCenter a TOFFEE variant for Data Center applications ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021



Watch on Youtube - [466//1] 158 VLOG - TOFFEE WAN Optimization Software Development live update - 6-Nov-2016 ↗

VPN Network Optimization via TOFFEE WAN Optimization ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
VPN Networks may degrade network performance due to various packet processing overheads such as encryption and by adding extra network protocol header(s) (such as IPv4/IPv6, IPSec, etc). This may inflate near MTU sized packets and causes excessive packet fragmentation. Here are the few examples of packet processing involved in a VPN (or a VPN like) Tunnel. With TOFFEE you can optimize these packets even before they get processed on to a VPN device. TOFFEE optimizes packet contents (application payload and transport headers) so that these TOFFEE optimized packets when they get processed by VPN devices (or VPN software stack) they may never need further packet fragmentation. Here is a deployment scenario of TOFFEE with VPN devices.



Research :: Optimization of network data (WAN Optimization) at various levels:
Network File level network data WAN Optimization


Learn Linux Systems Software and Kernel Programming:
Linux, Kernel, Networking and Systems-Software online classes


Hardware Compression and Decompression Accelerator Cards:
TOFFEE Architecture with Compression and Decompression Accelerator Card [CDN]


TOFFEE-DataCenter on a Dell Server - Intel Xeon E5645 CPU:
TOFFEE-DataCenter screenshots on a Dual CPU - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz - Dell Server