The TOFFEE Project
HOMEDOCUMENTATIONUPDATESVIDEOSRESEARCHDOWNLOADSPONSORSCONTACT


DOCUMENTATION 》 TEST CASES :: TEST RESULTS :: TOFFEE-Mocha-1.0.14 Development version

Here are the TOFFEE-Mocha test cases and test results of the upcoming new TOFFEE-Mocha which is still under development. The features of this TOFFEE-Mocha are discussed in the software development update: TOFFEE-Mocha WAN Emulation software development - Update: 1-July-2016

Test case1 :: 999 millisecond constant packet delay: As you can see unlike 40 milliseconds the maximum limit which existed earlier, the new 999 milliseconds delay range allows users to slow down the transfer rates even further.

[email protected]:~/temp$ ping 192.168.0.1 -s 1000
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2000 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2998 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2997 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=3995 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=3985 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=3984 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=3984 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=3983 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=3982 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=3984 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=3982 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
18 packets transmitted, 14 received, 22% packet loss, time 17007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2000.042/3277.214/3995.537/873.965 ms, pipe 4
[email protected]:~/temp$

Test case2 :: 500 millisecond constant packet delay: With 500 milliseconds you get roughly double the performance of 999 milliseconds.

[email protected]:~/temp$ ping 192.168.0.1 -s 1000
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1488 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1481 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1481 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1008 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 10 received, 9% packet loss, time 10017ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1002.077/1147.151/1488.063/220.133 ms, pipe 2
[email protected]:~/temp$

Test case3 :: 500 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay (in this case 500 milliseconds) if you enable the new random packet delay feature, it will skip delay randomly few packets. Which can be controlled via random delay factor. In this case the random delay factor value is set to 1. And you can see below few packets are not delayed. Hence their ping response time almost reduced to half (i.e around 500 ms).

[email protected]:~/temp$ ping 192.168.0.1 -s 1000
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1503 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1497 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=419 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=502 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=502 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=1001 ms
1008 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 21 received, 4% packet loss, time 21029ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 419.093/974.135/1503.026/250.662 ms, pipe 2
[email protected]:~/temp$

Random Packet delay: As discussed in my VLOG/update earlier, the idea of Random packet delay is to introduce the fluctuating, bursty nature of packet flow. So here are various tests done which shows the same in action. These tests below are performed while downloading a large file by enabling random packet delay along with various values of constant packet delay.

Test case4 :: 2 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay of 2 millisecond and random packet delay you can notice the blue curve which almost appears constant. The traffic in this case is bursty but it is not that significant to notice in the graph shown below.
TOFFEE_Mocha_2ms_delay_with_random_packet_delay

Test case5 :: 10 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay of 10 millisecond and random packet delay you can notice the blue curve which almost appears constant. The traffic in this case is bursty but it is not that significant to notice in the graph shown below. But it appears somewhat fluctuating than the 5 millisecond test case4 above.
TOFFEE_Mocha_10ms_delay_with_random_packet_delay

Test case6 :: 200 millisecond constant packet delay + random packet delay: With constant delay of 200 millisecond and random packet delay you can notice the fluctuating blue curve. With this we can understand the true purpose of random packet delay.
TOFFEE_Mocha_200ms_delay_with_random_packet_delay

Test case7 :: 200 millisecond constant packet delay + WITHOUT random packet delay: With constant delay of 200 millisecond and WITHOUT random packet delay feature enabled you can notice the steady blue curve. This is a direct comparison of a test case with constant packet delay 200 millisecond with and without random packet delay. With random packet delay it makes the network performance choppy, fluctuating and bursty, but without random packet delay feature the network performance appears almost constant.
TOFFEE_Mocha_200ms_delay_without_random_packet_delay

So in my next upcoming TOFFEE-Mocha release I may include all these new features and updated old features. If you are in need of any specific feature (or scenario) you can kindly let know. If plausible and feasible I can support the same and release as a part of my upcoming TOFFEE-Mocha release. Kindly stay tuned !



Suggested Topics:


TOFFEE-Mocha - WAN Emulator


Categories

💎 TOFFEE-MOCHA new bootable ISO: Download
💎 TOFFEE Data-Center Big picture and Overview: Download PDF


Recommended Topics:

Communication data network standards and data transfer speeds :: Chart ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Here is a complete chart comprising popular communication data network standards and their respective transfer rates. I hope this reference chart will help network engineers and network software developers while performing networking tests and experiments, building WAN/network products, building WAN simulated networks of a specific standard and so on. This may also helps us to track technological advancements of communication data networks.

Detect and Monitor Failing Harddrive in Linux - My Seagate 500GB HDD Died ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
My 500GB Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM hard-drive suddenly started making mild clicking noise. I found this happening since morning. I was suspicious that something wrong in this drive and when I opened the Linux Disks app, I can find the cause of this issue. The disk is increasingly getting read errors. Besides I can see various other parameters such as Power-On Hours, Temperature, Head flying hours, etc.

TOFFEE-Mocha WAN Emulation software development - Update: 1-July-2016 ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Today I got a feature request from Jonathan Withers. Jonathan is from a company called MultiWave Australia. He said he is able to get the TOFFEE-Mocha Raspberry Pi setup up and with that he is able to emulate geostationary satellite link. But he requested me is there a way to extend the constant packet delay from 40mS to 500mS. So as a part of his request I supported the same in the current ongoing development version of TOFFEE-Mocha.

Demo TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization VM Test Setup ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Network Latency and Bandwidth Assessment - for Network Admins and Infrastructure Architects ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Timelapse Screen Capture of TOFFEE-DataCenter Network Acceleration - with new RRDtool graph support ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Timelapse Screen Capture of TOFFEE-DataCenter Network Acceleration - with new RRDtool graph support

Watch on Youtube - 280 WAN Optimization - Animated demo of Packet Optimization in TOFFEE-DataCenter ↗


Communication data network standards and data transfer speeds :: Chart ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Here is a complete chart comprising popular communication data network standards and their respective transfer rates. I hope this reference chart will help network engineers and network software developers while performing networking tests and experiments, building WAN/network products, building WAN simulated networks of a specific standard and so on. This may also helps us to track technological advancements of communication data networks.

Network Latency and Bandwidth Assessment - for Network Admins and Infrastructure Architects ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Demo TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization VM Test Setup ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Detect and Monitor Failing Harddrive in Linux - My Seagate 500GB HDD Died ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
My 500GB Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM hard-drive suddenly started making mild clicking noise. I found this happening since morning. I was suspicious that something wrong in this drive and when I opened the Linux Disks app, I can find the cause of this issue. The disk is increasingly getting read errors. Besides I can see various other parameters such as Power-On Hours, Temperature, Head flying hours, etc.



Featured Educational Video:
Watch on Youtube - x226 Linux Kernel Tasklets | Big-Picture | vs User-Space pth... ↗

Communication data network standards and data transfer speeds :: Chart ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Here is a complete chart comprising popular communication data network standards and their respective transfer rates. I hope this reference chart will help network engineers and network software developers while performing networking tests and experiments, building WAN/network products, building WAN simulated networks of a specific standard and so on. This may also helps us to track technological advancements of communication data networks.

Network Latency and Bandwidth Assessment - for Network Admins and Infrastructure Architects ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Demo TOFFEE-DataCenter WAN Optimization VM Test Setup ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021

Detect and Monitor Failing Harddrive in Linux - My Seagate 500GB HDD Died ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
My 500GB Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM hard-drive suddenly started making mild clicking noise. I found this happening since morning. I was suspicious that something wrong in this drive and when I opened the Linux Disks app, I can find the cause of this issue. The disk is increasingly getting read errors. Besides I can see various other parameters such as Power-On Hours, Temperature, Head flying hours, etc.



Watch on Youtube - 280 WAN Optimization - Animated demo of Packet Optimization in TOFFEE-DataCenter ↗

Communication data network standards and data transfer speeds :: Chart ↗
Saturday' 13-Mar-2021
Here is a complete chart comprising popular communication data network standards and their respective transfer rates. I hope this reference chart will help network engineers and network software developers while performing networking tests and experiments, building WAN/network products, building WAN simulated networks of a specific standard and so on. This may also helps us to track technological advancements of communication data networks.



Research :: Optimization of network data (WAN Optimization) at various levels:
Network File level network data WAN Optimization


Learn Linux Systems Software and Kernel Programming:
Linux, Kernel, Networking and Systems-Software online classes [CDN]


Hardware Compression and Decompression Accelerator Cards:
TOFFEE Architecture with Compression and Decompression Accelerator Card


TOFFEE-DataCenter on a Dell Server - Intel Xeon E5645 CPU:
TOFFEE-DataCenter screenshots on a Dual CPU - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz - Dell Server